You must have read a lot of articles on various places in world and even visited some them . But how are we going to judge the best place to live? Pittoresque photographs look always very appealing in the newspapers or magazines.
If you ask to the Eskimos in Siberia - Alasca or Tuaregs in Burkina Faso they will tell you probably that their place is the best . How it is possible in such a big variation of climate and environment, people thoughts are different
We do have genetic differences for sure. While the black skin is protecting from the sun light in Ecuatorial areas a white skin of Siberians is absorbing available light as much possible.
Also habits ,cutoms and traditions are making our life more happier than in reality it is. Eskimos have over hundred depiction of the snow while Tuaregs know none of them.
We need food and shelter primarly. Than it comes reproduction according to Maslow need hierarchy. At this stage we cannot live alone, we need community where social problems start.
There is no any written laws in the nature. Big fish eats small fish. The strong are always best at proving they are right , as Lafontaine wrote. Hammurabi thought that being strong and big must not be way of evaluation the good and bad behaviour of mankind. The easiest solution was to set the law to egalitarianism. “Eye for an eye tooth for a tooth”. But this failed to solve social problems .
When a big fish eats a small fish it is normal , but when you eat a person it is cannibalism - the biggest crime of today.
When you live alone in the nature you can not commit any crime. Fruits of the trees are yours , fishes of the river are free. You are the lawmaker as long as you dont become the prey of a ferocious animal.
Why there is no faith in the nature? The ten commendments become senseless if you live alone in the nature. There is nobody to kill, nobody to adulterate , bear false witness or covet.
Can we say faith start in society?
Avram Aji
02.02.2018
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment